The Great Fire (2014)

 

Reviewer: Charity Bishop

 

I'm always frustrated to find a film full of potential that does not quite reach the heights to which it might have climbed. This is one such miniseries, a lavish production about one of the great disasters of its time, with a wide cast of fictional and historical figures and a terrific cast. The problem is that it's too unbelievable and too ambitious in its scope, without the follow through to truly make an impact on the audience.

 

It has been a long time since Sarah (Rose Leslie) has seen her husband, a navy man whose ship went down in flames. Left impoverished, she relies on the kindness of her brother in law, Thomas Farriner (Andrew Buchan), to see her through hard times... and also does needlework for the household of a wealthy member of court. Their lives are simple, and far outside the sphere of court intrigue. Nor is she aware that the kindly older man who has taken an interest in her son is actually Lord Denton (Charles Dance), the king's "enforcer," whose job it is to reveal and eradicate threats to the throne. Charles II (Jack Huston) lives a merry life with his barren wife and pregnant mistress, while being oblivious to the fact that his lavish parties and wardrobe is driving the state into ruin. One aspiring status climber is Samuel Pepys (Daniel Mays), who hopes his attendance upon the king in his best interests will bring them greater fortune, but unfortunately is having marital problems with his spirited young wife (Perditia Weeks).

 

Matters at court involving the king's bastard brother the Duke of York (Oliver Jackson-Cohen) escalate even as Thomas leaves his baking ovens one night to inform Sarah of her husband's fate. His daughter leaves the door of one open, a few sparks fall to the floor, and within an hour the entire street is on fire. Political intrigue and personal drama unfold even as the flames spread across London. Where the storyline falters is that you need a basic understanding of the history and figures of the period to know who anyone is; by failing to establish any groundwork at all, I was left grateful for my own familiarity with this court and the political upheaval at the time, which is only lightly touched on (the Protestant/Catholic conflict, which would later escalate into a civil war). The intensity, the political factions, the rivalry, and the devastating fire are all done well, but much of the plot relies on the characters making completely stupid decisions just to keep them "in the line of fire" (ha, ha). If Sarah is not in the midst of intrigue contrived to keep her in peril, her son is foolishly running straight toward the fire.

 

There are so many characters that we don't get to spend much time with any of them, which is a shame because the historical figures of this period are truly interesting; the fascinating relationship between the king and his most recent conquest (famous for not giving into his advances, and thus holding his attention for years) is left unexplored, romantic tension is established between Sarah and Lord Denton to no use, and then... plot lines are dropped, problems left unresolved, and the main arc satisfied by a brief interview before the king, a few questions, and a dismissal. Basically, four hours of espionage, persecution, and peril for the lives of the main characters are resolved; they simply go home to their smoking ruins of a house and start baking bread again. It has to be the most contrived, convenient, unbelievable, truncated ending I have ever seen. And it's a shame, because the cast is quite good and the costuming is absolutely gorgeous. It's obvious real money was sunk into this production on the basis of making it look gorgeous alone, which means its overall lack of a decent script is an even greater loss.

     
Sexual Content:
The king propositions a woman for a threesome and she declines; it's implied two main characters sleep together (she is married, but her husband has abandoned her; they kiss and pull at each other's clothes and fall out of the shot); a man pays another man to "use" his wife, then takes her into another room where they undress and have sex (we hear them faintly through a wall, and see some movement through a crack in the door); a woman nearly commits adultery but decides not to, once she sees the bed. The king lives openly with his mistress, to the distress of his wife. A woman is nearly raped in prison (she is forced to the floor and straddled) until a man intervenes to save her.
 
Language:
A few mild profanities and abuses of deity.
 
Violence:
Some violence is done to people in the streets; a woman is roughly handled; people are tortured for information, sometimes brutally (some blood); rioters hang a foreigner, who is shown twitching from a lamppost until he dies.

 
Other:
None.


Related Products

Books

Fiction & Nonfiction

Costume Dramas

TV & Movie Reviews

Femnista

FREE Literature, History & Film Webzine

Blog Posts

Digging Deeper into Culture